Subscribe to our Biweekly Digest, event invitations, and more.
Report Release: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force
New Education Sector report examines teacher pensions and details the problems facing current state pension programs.
Sport or Not? A Question for the Courts
Senior Policy Analyst Elena Silva interviewed by the New York Times on Title IX.
Teachers Unions as Agents of Reform
Brad Jupp, an architect of Denver's landmark performance-based teacher pay system, ProComp, is an outspoken advocate of both labor organizing and quality education for disadvantaged kids. In this interview, Jupp talks about ProComp, his views on teacher unionism, and the future of the teaching profession.
Education Sector Welcomes Three New Board Members
Education Sector's board of directors names three prominent leaders in the fields of education and journalism to the board: David W. Breneman, Richard Lee Colvin, and Peter McWalters.
For-profit colleges: Do they shortchange students?
Policy Director Kevin Carey comments on a recent Senate HELP Committee hearing on for-profit colleges.
Colleges, competing for top rankings, are using financial aid to attract the best possible students, assembling individualized financial aid "packages" for students that include federal loans and grants, work-study opportunities, and traditional "need-based" scholarships. And, increasingly, they are providing "institutional" grants. Money doesn't change hands with these grants—instead colleges charge less than their sticker prices, a practice known as "tuition discounting," which helps schools meet students’ financial needs, recruit desirable students, and build revenue by boosting enrollment.
Colleges don't advertise these deals. Students have to seek them out and, since financial aid notices are generally mailed out with acceptance letters, students don’t know the actual cost until after they have been accepted—sometimes after they haggle for a better price. Top students, those with higher grades and more extracurricular activities and thus more college options, are in the best position to barter with financial aid officers for the biggest tuition discounts. But even students who are not at the top of their class may be offered discounts. By offering small discounts to relatively wealthy students who can pay close to the sticker price, colleges earn more revenue than they would by offering large discounts to lower-income students. This strategy also helps increase overall enrollments and further boosts the bottom line.
If this sounds like it runs contrary to traditional notions of financial aid helping students who otherwise couldn’t afford college, it does. Colleges say that most discounts are used to fill financial "need," defined as the difference between the sticker price and what students and their families are able to pay under federal qualifying formulas. But offering tuition discounts to strong applicants regardless of their income threatens to cut into the aid institutions are able to offer to students who are most needy.
As Charts 1 and 2 show, tuition discounting is becoming increasingly common. These charts show student financial aid data from a sample of 130 private colleges defined by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) as having a small student body (fewer than 850 students in the freshman class) and, relative to other private colleges, low tuition (less than $25,000 per year). While the use of tuition discounting is rising throughout higher education, its growth among small private colleges is startling.1
Each square on Chart 1 represents an individual college in 1996. The horizontal axis shows the percent of freshmen receiving grants. The vertical axis shows the average grant those freshmen received, as a percentage of the sticker price.2
As Chart 2 shows, by 2005, much of the variation in financial aid policy had disappeared. The dots on Chart 2, representing the same 130 colleges, are more tightly clustered than the squares in Chart 1. Every college in the sample gave a discount to at least 60 percent of students, and, on average, 92 percent of students received some institutional grant. The typical size of the grant also fell into a fairly narrow range, with most between 40 percent and 60 percent of the sticker price.
Endnotes
1 Tuition discounting is also growing at public universities, see for example Baum & Lapovsky’s 2006 College Board report, “Tuition Discounting: Not Just a Private College Practice.” Accessible at http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/press/tuition-discounting.pdf
2 NACUBO defines an institution’s tuition discount as the total amount of institutional grants given, including restricted endowment grants and athletic scholarships, divided by the total tuition and fee revenue the institution would have received had all students paid the full price.